Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19284678›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2009

Detecting parent of origin and dominant QTL in a two-generation commercial poultry pedigree using variance component methodology.

Suzanne J Rowe, Ricardo Pong-Wong, Christopher S Haley, Sara A Knott, Dirk-Jan De Koning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Joint QTL analysis of three connected F2-crosses in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suzanne J RoweRoslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK. Suzanne.Rowe@Roslin.ed.ac.uk
Ricardo Pong-Wong
Christopher S Haley
Sara A Knott
Dirk-Jan De Koning

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001604Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001606Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/R/00001615Medical Research Council MC_U127592696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVariance component QTL methodology was used to analyse three candidate regions on chicken chromosomes 1, 4 and 5 for dominant and parent-of-origin QTL effects. Data were available for bodyweight and conformation score measured at 40 days from a two-generation commercial broiler dam line. One hundred dams were nested in 46 sires with phenotypes and genotypes on 2708 offspring. Linear models were constructed to simultaneously estimate fixed, polygenic and QTL effects. Different genetic models were compared using likelihood ratio test statistics derived from the comparison of full with reduced or null models. Empirical thresholds were derived by permutation analysis.

resultsDominant QTL were found for bodyweight on chicken chromosome 4 and for bodyweight and conformation score on chicken chromosome 5. Suggestive evidence for a maternally expressed QTL for bodyweight and conformation score was found on chromosome 1 in a region corresponding to orthologous imprinted regions in the human and mouse.

conclusionInitial results suggest that variance component analysis can be applied within commercial populations for the direct detection of segregating dominant and parent of origin effects.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenomic ImprintingQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBody WeightChickensChromosomesCrosses, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMicePedigree

Identifiers

PMID19284678
PMCPMC2637028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.