ArticleBMC systems biology2009
Topological and organizational properties of the products of house-keeping and tissue-specific genes in protein-protein interaction networks.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological interacting units identified in human protein networks reveal tissue-functional diversification and its impact on disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Three topological features of regulatory networks control life-essential and specialized subsystems.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- Conventionally used reference genes are not outstanding for normalization of gene expression in human cancer research.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A protein network descriptor server and its use in studying protein, disease, metabolic and drug targeted networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Topological features of a gene co-expression network predict patterns of natural diversity in environmental response.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
- Effects of different kinds of essentiality on sequence evolution of human testis proteins.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-selective genes in human based on network topologies and biological properties.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Identification of hub subnetwork based on topological features of genes in breast cancer.International journal of molecular medicine · 2015Article
- Human protein interaction networks across tissues and diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Integrating the interactome and the transcriptome of Drosophila.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Determinants of expression variability.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Characterization of regulatory features of housekeeping and tissue-specific regulators within tissue regulatory networks.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Adding protein context to the human protein-protein interaction network to reveal meaningful interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Cell type specificity of signaling: view from membrane receptors distribution and their downstream transduction networks.Protein & cell · 2012Article
- Article
- Enhancing the prioritization of disease-causing genes through tissue specific protein interaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Model-based clustering reveals vitamin D dependent multi-centrality hubs in a network of vitamin-related proteins.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- The relationships among microRNA regulation, intrinsically disordered regions, and other indicators of protein evolutionary rate.Molecular biology and evolution · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman cells of various tissue types differ greatly in morphology despite having the same set of genetic information. Some genes are expressed in all cell types to perform house-keeping functions, while some are selectively expressed to perform tissue-specific functions. In this study, we wished to elucidate how proteins encoded by human house-keeping genes and tissue-specific genes are organized in human protein-protein interaction networks. We constructed protein-protein interaction networks for different tissue types using two gene expression datasets and one protein-protein interaction database. We then calculated three network indices of topological importance, the degree, closeness, and betweenness centralities, to measure the network position of proteins encoded by house-keeping and tissue-specific genes, and quantified their local connectivity structure.
resultsCompared to a random selection of proteins, house-keeping gene-encoded proteins tended to have a greater number of directly interacting neighbors and occupy network positions in several shortest paths of interaction between protein pairs, whereas tissue-specific gene-encoded proteins did not. In addition, house-keeping gene-encoded proteins tended to connect with other house-keeping gene-encoded proteins in all tissue types, whereas tissue-specific gene-encoded proteins also tended to connect with other tissue-specific gene-encoded proteins, but only in approximately half of the tissue types examined.
conclusionOur analysis showed that house-keeping gene-encoded proteins tend to occupy important network positions, while those encoded by tissue-specific genes do not. The biological implications of our findings were discussed and we proposed a hypothesis regarding how cells organize their protein tools in protein-protein interaction networks. Our results led us to speculate that house-keeping gene-encoded proteins might form a core in human protein-protein interaction networks, while clusters of tissue-specific gene-encoded proteins are attached to the core at more peripheral positions of the networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.