Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19283468›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2009

Molecular mechanisms leading to neuroprotection/ischemic tolerance: effect of preconditioning on the stress reaction of endoplasmic reticulum.

J Lehotský, P Urban, M Pavlíková, Z Tatarková, B Kaminska, P Kaplán

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Type I interferons and endoplasmic reticulum stress in health and disease.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ischemic preconditioning and clinical scenarios.Current opinion in neurology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J LehotskýDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 036 01 Martin, Slovak Republic. lehotsky@jfmed.uniba.sk
P Urban
M Pavlíková
Z Tatarková
B Kaminska
P Kaplán
Comenius University Bratislava · SKInstytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic tolerance can be developed by prior ischemic non-injurious stimulus preconditioning. The molecular mechanisms underlying ischemic tolerance are not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preconditioning/preischemia on ischemic brain injury. We examined the endoplasmic reticulum stress response (unfolded protein response (UPR)) by measuring the mRNA and protein levels of specific genes such as ATF6, GRP78, and XBP1 after 15 min 4-VO ischemia and different times of reperfusion (1, 3, and 24 h). The data from the group of naïve ischemic rats were compared with data from the group of preconditioned animals. The results of the experiments showed significant changes in the gene expression at the mRNA level in the all ischemic/reperfusion phases. The influence of preischemia on protein level of XBP was significant in later ischemic times and at 3 h, the reperfusion reached 230% of the controls. The protein levels of GRP78 in preischemic animals showed a significant increase in ischemic and reperfusion times. They exceeded to 50% levels of corresponding naïve ischemic/reperfusion groups. Preconditioning also induced remarkable changes in the levels of ATF6 protein in the ischemic phase (about 170%). The levels of ATF6 remained elevated in earlier reperfusion times (37 and 62%, respectively) and persisted significantly elevated after 24 h of reperfusion. This data suggest that preconditioning paradigm (preischemia) underlies its neuroprotective effect by the attenuation of ER stress response after acute ischemic/reperfusion insult.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningActivating Transcription Factor 6AnimalsBlotting, WesternBrainDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHippocampusIschemic Attack, TransientMaleMolecular ChaperonesNeuronsRatsRats, WistarActivating Transcription Factor 6Atf6 protein, ratDNA-Binding ProteinsEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPGRP78 protein, ratHeat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesRegulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1Xbp1 protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID19283468
PMCPMC11506296
OpenAlexW2019389917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.