Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19282853›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2009

Models of haematopoiesis: seeing the wood for the trees.

Rhodri Ceredig, Antonius G Rolink, Geoffrey Brown

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cell Lineage Affiliation During Hematopoiesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fetal liver development and implications for liver disease pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Social Norm of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Dysregulation in Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Oncogenes and the Origins of Leukemias.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Lessons to cancer from studies of leukemia and hematopoiesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Oncogenes, Proto-Oncogenes, and Lineage Restriction of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Nature and Niche Nurture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Towards a New Understanding of Decision-Making by Hematopoietic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rhodri CeredigRegenerative Medicine Institute, National Centre for Biomedical Engineering Science, Department of Physiology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. rod.ceredig@nuigalway.ie
Antonius G Rolink
Geoffrey Brown

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many models of haematopoiesis dictate that haematopoietic stem cells make an early and irrevocable choice between lymphoid and myeloid cell fates. However, recent data show that intermediate progenitors have both lymphoid and myeloid potential, thereby refuting early theories and leading to a lack of consensus in the field. In this Opinion article we present a simple pairwise relationships model of cell fate determination that does not depend on the underlying developmental branch points that in other models dictate a preferred route (or routes) to a particular cell fate.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageHematopoiesisHumansLymphoid Progenitor CellsMyeloid Progenitor CellsPrecursor Cells, B-LymphoidPrecursor Cells, T-LymphoidTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19282853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.