Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19282844›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2009

Evaluation of the clonal origin of multiple primary melanomas using molecular profiling.

Irene Orlow, Diana V Tommasi, Bradley Bloom, Irina Ostrovnaya, Javier Cotignola, Urvi Mujumdar, Klaus J Busam, Achim A Jungbluth, Richard A Scolyer, John F Thompson and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Integrative genomics with mediation analysis in a survival context.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013
    Article
  9. Testing clonality of three and more tumors using their loss of heterozygosity profiles.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A strategy for distinguishing optimal cancer subtypes.International journal of cancer · 2011
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Testing clonal relatedness of tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization: a statistical challenge.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene OrlowDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Diana V Tommasi
Bradley Bloom
Irina Ostrovnaya
Javier Cotignola
Urvi Mujumdar
Klaus J Busam
Achim A Jungbluth
Richard A Scolyer
John F Thompson
Bruce K Armstrong
Marianne Berwick
Nancy E Thomas
Colin B Begg
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
Melanoma RAS/BRAF Mutation:Heterogeneity-Risk-PrognosisR01CA112243 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI THOMAS, NANCY E. · 2005 to 2014
$5.4M
Statistical Methods for Identifying Clonal TumorsR01CA124504 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BEGG, COLIN B · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
Mutational Analysis of Clonality in Multiple Primary MelanomaR03CA125829 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ORLOW, IRENE · 2006 to 2007
$128k
NCI NIH HHS CA124504NCI NIH HHS CA125829NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124504NCI NIH HHS R03 CA125829NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous investigations have been conducted using molecular profiling to evaluate the possible clonal origin of second malignancies in various cancer types. However, to date no study assessing clonality of multiple primaries has been conducted in melanoma. In this investigation using patients treated at a specialist melanoma treatment center, we compared the somatic mutational profiles of pairs of melanomas designated as independent on the basis of thorough assessment of their clinical and pathologic characteristics. We used a set of highly polymorphic genetic markers selected on the basis of their chromosomal positions and the frequencies of reported allelic losses at these genetic loci. Our statistical testing strategy showed no significant evidence of clonal origin of the two primaries in 17 of the 19 patients examined. The results suggest that most second melanomas designated as independent primary tumors on the basis of their clinicopathologic features are indeed independent occurrences of the disease, supporting the validity of the criteria used by experienced pathologists in distinguishing new primaries from metastases.

Indexed as

MutationHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMelanomaNeoplasms, Multiple PrimarySkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19282844
PMCPMC2745834
OpenAlexW1999964370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.