Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19281919›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2009

Heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction.

Micha T Maeder, David M Kaye

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01053091 (Effect of Exercise-based Rehabilitation on Circulatory Functions in Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01053091 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Exercise-based Rehabilitation on Circulatory Functions in Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2009 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsHeart FailureArmsexercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hemodynamics in Left-Sided Cardiomyopathies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Micha T MaederHeart Failure Research Group, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, and Heart Center, Alfred Hospital, St Kilda Road, Central Melbourne 8008 VIC, Australia.
David M Kaye

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that approximately 50% of the heart failure population has a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, a complex broadly referred to as heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (HFNEF). While these patients have been considered in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials to represent a single pool of patients, limited more detailed studies indicate that HFNEF patients are a very heterogeneous group, with a number of key pathophysiologic mechanisms. This review summarizes and critically analyzes available data on the pathophysiology of HFNEF, placing it into context with a recently developed diagnostic algorithm. We evaluate the utility of commonly applied echocardiographic measures and biomarkers and integrate mechanistic observations into potential future therapeutic directions.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeAlgorithmsAtrial FibrillationBiomarkersCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCoronary Artery DiseaseDiastoleDyspneaEchocardiography, DopplerExerciseHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainOxygen ConsumptionPeptide FragmentsBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.