Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19280232›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2009

An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Masashi Miyazaki, Hiroshi Tsumura, Jeffrey C Wang, Ahmet Alanay

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03407560 (Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03407560 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Use of the Bone Substitute SintLife® in Vertebral Arthrodesis Procedures. A Pilot Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2017 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsSpinal FusionArmsSintLife
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy and safety of bone substitutes in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Platelet-rich plasma in mono-segmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2011
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Ceramic substitutes, failure to achieve solid fusion in posterolateral instrumented fusion: a surgical and histological evaluation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Allografts and Spinal Fusion.International journal of spine surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Interbody options in lumbar fusion.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masashi MiyazakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oita University, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Hiroshi Tsumura
Jeffrey C Wang
Ahmet Alanay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the current advances in spinal surgery, an understanding of the precise biological mechanism of each bone substitute is necessary for inducing successful spinal fusion. In this review, the categories of bone substitutes include allografts, ceramics, demineralized bone matrix, osteoinductive factors, autogenous platelet concentrate, mesenchymal stem cells, and gene therapy. Further, clinical studies have been evaluated by their levels of evidence in order to elucidate the precise effect of the bone substitute employed and to establish clinical guidance. This article will review both clinical studies based on evidence and basic research in current advances in order to avoid as far as possible any chances of failure in the future and to understand cellular biology in novel technologies.

Indexed as

Bone MatrixBone SubstitutesCeramicsGenetic TherapyHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionTransplantation, HomologousBone SubstitutesPlatelet-Derived Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID19280232
PMCPMC2899672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.