Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19280084›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2009

Comparison of two different paclitaxel-coated balloon catheters in the porcine coronary restenosis model.

Bodo Cremers, Melanie Biedermann, Dirk Mahnkopf, Michael Böhm, Bruno Scheller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Compassionate use of a paclitaxel coated balloon in patients with refractory recurrent coronary in-stent restenosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia with a novel zotarolimus coated balloon catheter.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bodo CremersKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie, Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany. bodo.cremers@uks.eu
Melanie Biedermann
Dirk Mahnkopf
Michael Böhm
Bruno Scheller
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-eluting balloon (DEB) catheters coated with paclitaxel in a water-soluble matrix have shown beneficial effects in the treatment and prevention of restenosis in the porcine coronary overstretch model and in clinical trials. Adherence of paclitaxel, same dose, on another recently introduced coated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) catheter (DIOR) is mediated by a roughened balloon surface. Only scarce experimental and clinical data has been published on the new coating method. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the two coatings in the porcine model. METHODS AND

resultsTwenty-eight stainless steel stents were implanted in the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries of 14 domestic pigs using either matrix-coated (n = 8), roughened DEB (n = 9), or uncoated PCI catheters, which served as control (n = 11). After 28 days, quantitative angiography and histomorphometry of the stented arteries were performed. Matrix-coated DEB led to a highly significant (P < 0.01) reduction of all parameters indicating neointimal proliferation compared to both, uncoated control and the roughened DEB; late lumen loss in-segment was 0.4 +/- 0.2, 1.9 +/- 0.5, and 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. In contrast, the roughened DEB failed to produce statistically significant effects on angiographic measures of stenosis or morphometric parameters such as maximal neointimal thickness and luminal area, except for neointimal area (5.7 +/- 1.5 mm(2) in the control group, 4.1 +/- 1.7 mm(2) roughened DEB, P < 0.05 vs. control, and 2.5 +/- 0.8 mm(2) matrix-coated DEB, P < 0.01 vs. control).

conclusionInhibition of neointimal proliferation in the porcine coronary overstretch model by paclitaxel depends critically on the coating method.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatheterizationCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary RestenosisDisease Models, AnimalDrug-Eluting StentsGraft Occlusion, VascularHumansPaclitaxelSwineTubulin ModulatorsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelTubulin Modulators

Identifiers

PMID19280084
OpenAlexW2029660039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.