Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19280083›Full record

Trial reportSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2009

Working with mental health problems: clients' experiences of IPS, vocational rehabilitation and employment.

Marsha Koletsi, Astrid Niersman, Jooske T van Busschbach, Jocelyn Catty, Thomas Becker, Tom Burns, Angelo Fioritti, Rana Kalkan, Christoph Lauber, Wulf Rössler and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How do supported employment programs work? Answers from a systematic literature review.International journal for educational and vocational guidance · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fit for Work and Life-an eight-week program for improvement of functionality and quality of life : A two-stage study.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2022
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An Integrative Review of Recovery Services to Improve the Lives of Adults Living with Severe Mental Illness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marsha KoletsiDivision of Mental Health, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
Astrid Niersman
Jooske T van Busschbach
Jocelyn Catty
Thomas Becker
Tom Burns
Angelo Fioritti
Rana Kalkan
Christoph Lauber
Wulf Rössler
Toma Tomov
Durk Wiersma
EQOLISE Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the effectiveness of individual placement and support (IPS) has been well established, little is known about clients' perceptions of the model compared to usual vocational rehabilitation, nor about their experiences of searching for and returning to work with this kind of support. This qualitative study aimed to explore clients' views of the difficulties of obtaining and maintaining employment, their experiences of the support received from their IPS or Vocational Service workers and the perceived impact of work on clients' lives.

methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 people with psychotic disorders participating in a six-centre international randomised controlled trial of IPS compared to usual vocational rehabilitation. To assess their experiences of the services and the perceived effects of working, two IPS and two Vocational Service clients at each centre who had found work during the study period were interviewed, along with two IPS and two Vocational Service clients at each centre who had not.

resultsIPS clients reported having received more help seeking and maintaining employment, whereas Vocational Service clients reported having received more help in finding sheltered employment or placements. Clients who had worked associated this with financial stability, improved social lives, increased self-esteem, integration into society and amelioration of their symptoms, as well as reduced feelings of boredom and isolation, but also reported increased levels of stress. IPS clients as well as Vocational Service ones reported not receiving enough follow-up support, despite this being proposed as a key feature of the model.

conclusionFindings from the in-depth interviews reflect differences in service models that have also been tested quantitatively but further work in disaggregating the IPS model and assessing the impact of each component would be valuable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthEmploymentEmployment, SupportedFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPrognosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRehabilitation, VocationalSocial SupportStress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.