SynthesisThe Canadian journal of cardiology2009
Endothelin receptor antagonist therapy in congenital heart disease with shunt-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Prospective clinical assessment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension switched from bosentan to macitentan (POTENT).Pulmonary circulation · 2022Article
- Heart failure in adult congenital heart disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) with systemic-topulmonary shunting is associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). There are similar clinical and pathophysiological features between CHD with shunt-associated PAH and idiopathic PAH. Endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) are oral medications that improve pulmonary hemodynamics, symptoms and functional capacity in many PAH patients. However, the role of ERAs in CHD with shunt-associated PAH is unclear.
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched for articles published from 1966 through September 2006, as well as bibliographies of all retrieved papers. All published English-language studies of adult CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH treated with ERAs were reviewed for clinical, functional and hemodynamic outcomes.
resultsTen studies of 174 adult CHD subjects with shunt-associated PAH were identified. Other than one placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, all studies were open-label, uncontrolled observational trials. Subjects were treated with the ERA bosentan for a mean (+/- SD) of 9+/-7 months. Nine studies reported improved World Health Organization (WHO) modification of the New York Heart Association functional class, with 95 of 164 subjects (58%) improving by at least one functional class. The 6 min walk distance improved in all eight studies in which it was assessed. Bosentan was generally well tolerated; 2.3% of subjects withdrew because of elevated liver enzymes. Two patients with WHO functional class IV PAH died during bosentan therapy.
conclusionTreatment of CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH with the ERA bosentan is associated with an improvement in functional class and objectively measured exercise capacity. The consistency of the uncontrolled data and the positive results of a single randomized clinical trial suggest a role for ERA therapy in CHD patients with shunt-associated PAH. Caution is suggested when considering bosentan therapy for CHD patients with WHO functional class IV PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.