Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19278419›Full record

ReviewImmunology2009

CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset.

Aurélie Poli, Tatiana Michel, Maud Thérésine, Emmanuel Andrès, François Hentges, Jacques Zimmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 577 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
577citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

577 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Natural Killer Cells: Dual Regulators and Therapeutic Targets in Multiple Sclerosis Immunopathogenesis.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PMAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

517 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aurélie PoliLaboratoire d'Immunogénétique-Allergologie, Centre de Recherche Public de la Santé, Luxembourg-City, Luxembourg.
Tatiana Michel
Maud Thérésine
Emmanuel Andrès
François Hentges
Jacques Zimmer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human natural killer (NK) cells can be subdivided into different populations based on the relative expression of the surface markers CD16 and CD56. The two major subsets are CD56(bright) CD16(dim/) (-) and CD56(dim) CD16(+), respectively. In this review, we will focus on the CD56(bright) NK cell subset. These cells are numerically in the minority in peripheral blood but constitute the majority of NK cells in secondary lymphoid tissues. They are abundant cytokine producers but are only weakly cytotoxic before activation. Recent data suggest that under certain conditions, they have immunoregulatory properties, and that they are probably immediate precursors of CD56(dim) NK cells. CD56(bright) NK cell percentages are expanded or reduced in a certain number of diseases, but the significance of these variations is not yet clear.

Indexed as

CD56 AntigenCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte SubsetsLymphoid TissueUterusCD56 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID19278419
PMCPMC2673358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.