Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19277111›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2009

Clinical diagnostic utility of IP-10 and LAM antigen levels for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions in a high burden setting.

Keertan Dheda, Richard N Van-Zyl Smit, Leonardo A Sechi, Motasim Badri, Richard Meldau, Gregory Symons, Hoosein Khalfey, Igshaan Carr, Alice Maredza, Rodney Dawson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sero-diagnosis of ActiveMycobacterial diseases : tuberculosis & leprosy · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Keertan DhedaLung Infection and Immunity Unit & CTBRI, UCT Lung Institute & Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. keertan.dheda@uct.ac.za
Richard N Van-Zyl Smit
Leonardo A Sechi
Motasim Badri
Richard Meldau
Gregory Symons
Hoosein Khalfey
Igshaan Carr
Alice Maredza
Rodney Dawson
Helen Wainright
Andrew Whitelaw
Eric D Bateman
Alimuddin Zumla
University of Cape Town · ZALung Institute · USLondon International Development Centre · GBNational Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent tools for the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusions are sub-optimal. Data about the value of new diagnostic technologies are limited, particularly, in high burden settings. Preliminary case control studies have identified IFN-gamma-inducible-10 kDa protein (IP-10) as a promising diagnostic marker; however, its diagnostic utility in a day-to-day clinical setting is unclear. Detection of LAM antigen has not previously been evaluated in pleural fluid.

methodsWe investigated the comparative diagnostic utility of established (adenosine deaminase [ADA]), more recent (standardized nucleic-acid-amplification-test [NAAT]) and newer technologies (a standardized LAM mycobacterial antigen-detection assay and IP-10 levels) for the evaluation of pleural effusions in 78 consecutively recruited South African tuberculosis suspects. All consenting participants underwent pleural biopsy unless contra-indicated or refused. The reference standard comprised culture positivity for M. tuberculosis or histology suggestive of tuberculosis. PRINCIPAL

findingsOf 74 evaluable subjects 48, 7 and 19 had definite, probable and non-TB, respectively. IP-10 levels were significantly higher in TB vs non-TB participants (p<0.0001). The respective outcomes [sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV %] for the different diagnostic modalities were: ADA at the 30 IU/L cut-point [96; 69; 90; 85], NAAT [6; 93; 67; 28], IP-10 at the 28,170 pg/ml ROC-derived cut-point [80; 82; 91; 64], and IP-10 at the 4035 pg/ml cut-point [100; 53; 83; 100]. Thus IP-10, using the ROC-derived cut-point, missed approximately 20% of TB cases and mis-diagnosed approximately 20% of non-TB cases. By contrast, when a lower cut-point was used a negative test excluded TB. The NAAT had a poor sensitivity but high specificity. LAM antigen-detection was not diagnostically useful.

conclusionAlthough IP-10, like ADA, has sub-optimal specificity, it may be a clinically useful rule-out test for tuberculous pleural effusions. Larger multi-centric studies are now required to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialChemokine CXCL10LipopolysaccharidesPleural EffusionTuberculosis, PleuralAdenosine DeaminaseBiomarkersBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialEndemic DiseasesHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPleural Effusion, MalignantProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAdenosine DeaminaseAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersChemokine CXCL10CXCL10 protein, humanlipoarabinomannanLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID19277111
PMCPMC2650091
OpenAlexW2052614354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.