Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19277053›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2009

Prenatal exposure to drugs: effects on brain development and implications for policy and education.

Barbara L Thompson, Pat Levitt, Gregg D Stanwood

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 360 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Memory under siege: the cognitive costs of smoking and vaping.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Internal assets in low-income urban adolescents from 12 to 17 years: Gender variation.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Alternative splicing events as peripheral biomarkers for motor learning deficit caused by adverse prenatal environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Prenatal Substance Exposure.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2023
    Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara L ThompsonDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Pat Levitt
Gregg D Stanwood
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, ADAM W · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
Brain Structure &Function after Fetal Cocaine ExposureR01DA011165 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LEVITT, PAT R · 1996 to 2005
$2.0M
FETAL COCAINE AND GENE EXPRESSION DEFECTS IN FOREBRAINR01DA013792 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LEVITT, PAT R · 2000 to 2002
$657k
Developmental consequences of in utero cocaineF32DA020981 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, BARBARA L · 2006 to 2008
$153k
Dopaminergic Influences on Brain Formation and FunctionR03DA017957 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STANWOOD, GREGG D · 2005 to 2006
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA020981NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011165NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013792NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA017957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of prenatal exposure to drugs on brain development are complex and are modulated by the timing, dose and route of drug exposure. It is difficult to assess these effects in clinical cohorts as these are beset with problems such as multiple exposures and difficulties in documenting use patterns. This can lead to misinterpretation of research findings by the general public, the media and policy makers, who may mistakenly assume that the legal status of a drug correlates with its biological impact on fetal brain development and long-term clinical outcomes. It is important to close the gap between what science tells us about the impact of prenatal drug exposure on the fetus and the mother and what we do programmatically with regard to at-risk populations.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAlcoholsAmphetamineAntidepressive AgentsBrainChildCrack CocaineFemaleHumansMaternal-Fetal ExchangeMethamphetamineNicotinePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSubstance-Related DisordersAlcoholsAmphetamineAntidepressive AgentsCrack CocaineMethamphetamineNicotine

Identifiers

PMID19277053
PMCPMC2777887
OpenAlexW2010747514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.