Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19275825›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

The identification of young people's emotional distress: a study in primary care.

Dagmar M Haller, Lena A Sanci, Susan M Sawyer, George C Patton

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2014
    Article
  19. Patterns of engagement between GPs and adolescents presenting with psychological difficulties: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  20. GPs' responses to adolescents presenting with psychological difficulties: a conceptual model of fixers, future planners, and collaborators.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dagmar M HallerDepartment of Community Medicine and Primary Care, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland. dagmar.haller-hester@hcuge.ch
Lena A Sanci
Susan M Sawyer
George C Patton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care is a key step in young people's pathway to mental health care. Despite the high prevalence of mental disorder in this age group, little is known about the factors that determine the identification of young people's mental disorder in primary care.

aimTo provide a detailed description of the factors associated with both 'correct' and 'excessive' identification of youth mental disorder in primary care. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Cross-sectional study.

settingTwenty-six randomly selected general practices in Victoria, Australia.

methodConsecutive young people (16-24 years) were interviewed before their consultation, using a semi-structured interview. They completed Kessler's scale of emotional distress (K10). GPs completed a questionnaire after the consultation. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the factors associated with GP identification of mental disorder in those with high and low probability of disorder on the K10.

resultsAltogether, 450/501 (90%) of approached young people participated; 36.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32.3 to 40.2%) had high probability of mental disorder on the K10. Young people's perception that they had a mental illness was highly associated with GP identification (odds ratio [OR] = 62.6, 95% CI = 22.8 to 172.0). Other significantly associated factors were: patient fears (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.1 to 5.1), frequent consultations (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.0 to 8.4), days out of role (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.2 to 5.7), and continuity of care (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.6 to 6.9). The latter two were also associated with 'over-identification' of young people who had low probability of mental disorder. GP characteristics were not associated with identification.

conclusionThese findings provide guidance for GPs in their clinical work and training. They should also inform the further development of mental health literacy programmes in the community.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthFamily PracticeAdolescentEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSocioeconomic FactorsVictoriaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19275825
PMCPMC2648934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.