Trial reportPsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie
[Diagnosis and therapy of depression in the elderly--influence of patient and physician characteristics].
Trial report in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies from the United States and the United Kingdom show variations in medical decision making concerning the primary care of depression. Patient and physicians attributes independently influence doctors' decisions regardless of the patients' condition. In this paper results are presented on how these factors influence primary care doctors' diagnostic and management decisions regarding a depression in Germany. A factorial experiment with a videotaped patient consultation was conducted. Professional actors played the role of patients with symptoms of a depression. A videotape with typical symptoms of the disease under study was produced where actors differ according to age (55 vs. 75 years), gender, and social status (teacher vs. janitor) in order to mirror respective patient characteristics. The videotape was presented to a total of 128 randomly selected primary care physicians in Germany, taking gender and duration of professional experience (<5 vs. >15 years) into account. Physicians confronted with the videotape were asked to judge the clinical condition and to give recommendations for diagnosis and therapy. In particular, the physicians were asked what questions they would ask, to name the most likely diagnoses, what their certainty levels were, which test(s) they would order, which medication(s) they would prescribe, and what lifestyle recommendation(s) they would make if they saw the patient from the video in their everyday clinical practice. Contrary to international studies results show only minor variation in the primary care of depression. Thus, in most aspects care of depression in Germany seems to be independent from patients' and physicians' characteristics under study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.