Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19273865›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine

Influence of watchful waiting on satisfaction and anxiety among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints.

Marloes A van Bokhoven, Hèlen Koch, Trudy van der Weijden, Richard P T M Grol, Arnold D Kester, Paula E L M Rinkens, Patrick J E Bindels, Geert-Jan Dinant

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07158892 (Confirmation of Values and Preferences When Considering a Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07158892 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Confirmation of Values and Preferences When Considering a Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Test: A Scenario-Based Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2025 to 2026Enrolled220ConditionsNon-traumatic Musculoskeletal Conditions, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Lateral Epicondylitis, OsteoarthritisArmsDiagnostic Advance Care Planning Discussion, Informational Statement Only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Ordering blood tests for patients with unexplained fatigue in general practice: what does it yield? Results of the VAMPIRE trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. GPs' perspectives on diagnostic testing in children with persistent non-specific symptoms: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marloes A van BokhovenDepartment of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research, Maastricht University, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands. Loes.vanbokhoven@hag.unimaas.nl
Hèlen Koch
Trudy van der Weijden
Richard P T M Grol
Arnold D Kester
Paula E L M Rinkens
Patrick J E Bindels
Geert-Jan Dinant

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe undertook a study to determine whether test-ordering strategy and other consultation-related factors influence satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation among patients seeking care for unexplained complaints.

methodsA cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted in family medicine practices in the Netherlands. Participants were 498 patients with unexplained complaints seen by 63 primary care physicians. Physicians either immediately ordered a blood test for patients or followed a 4-week watchful waiting approach. Physicians and patients completed questionnaires asking about their characteristics, satisfaction with care, and anxiety, and aspects of the consultation. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction and anxiety. Data were analyzed by multilevel logistic regression analysis.

resultsPatients were generally satisfied with their consultation and had moderately low anxiety afterward (mean scores on 11-point scales, 7.3 and 3.1, respectively), with no difference between the immediate testing and watchful waiting groups (chi(2) = 2.4 and 0.3, respectively). The factors associated with higher odds of satisfaction were mainly related to physician-patient communication: patients' satisfaction with their physician generally, feeling taken seriously, and knowing the seriousness of complaints afterward; physicians' discussing testing and not considering complaints bearable; and older physician age. The same was true for factors associated with higher odds of anxiety: patients expecting testing or referral, patients not knowing the seriousness of their complaints afterward, and physicians not seeing a cause for alarm.

conclusionsTest-ordering strategy does not influence patients' satisfaction with and anxiety after a consultation. Instead, specific aspects of physician-patient communication are important. Apparently, primary care physicians underestimate how much they can contribute to the well-being of their patients by discussing their worries.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAnxietyAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHematologic TestsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObservationPrimary Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareReferral and ConsultationSomatoform Disorders

Identifiers

PMID19273865
PMCPMC2653963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.