ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2009
Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
138 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 319 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of osteomyelitis: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Dynamic distribution of systemically administered antibiotics in orthopeadically relevant target tissues and settings.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Italian consensus on the therapeutic management of uncomplicated acute hematogenous osteomyelitis in children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Musculoskeletal infections caused by Aerococcus urinae: a case-based review.Clinical rheumatology · 2018Pooled it
- Recommendations for the treatment of osteomyelitis.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesGuideline
- Periprosthetic joint infections in femoral neck fracture patients treated with hemiarthroplasty - should we use antibiotic-loaded bone cement?World journal of orthopedics · 2022Trial
- Daptomycin > 6 mg/kg/day as salvage therapy in patients with complex bone and joint infection: cohort study in a regional reference center.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Trial
- Concentrations of amoxicillin and clindamycin in teeth following a single dose of oral medication.Clinical oral investigations · 2014Trial
- Effectiveness and tolerability of low dose clindamycin for treatment of prosthetic joint infections, a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Investigating PXR (NR1I2) genetic polymorphisms as possible determinants of the magnitude of the clindamycin-rifampicin pharmacokinetic interaction.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Biodesulfurization and activation of a thionated levofloxacin derivative: antimicrobial evaluation and LC-MS-based metabolic profiling.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Quantification of Vancomycin and Clindamycin in Synovial Tissue and Bone Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2026Article
- Osteomyelitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Tetracyclines in Bone and Joint Infections: A Literature Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Methodologies for Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Target-Site Drug Exposure: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Reflections on the Theoretical Prerequisites for Initial Oral Antibiotic Treatment for Paediatric Bone and Joint Infections: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Temocillin: a therapeutic alternative in bone and joint infections due to third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales?The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Cefuroxime in Plasma and Bone of Patients with Prosthetic Joint Infection: Is There Room for Dose Optimization?Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Managing Bone Infections Beyond Systemic Antibiotics: A Scoping Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibacterials play a key role in the treatment of bone infections and appropriate surgical prophylaxis. The rate and extent of penetration of antimicrobials into bone has been assessed and shown to be important for successful treatment in numerous studies. However, no recent review or critical evaluation of the analytical techniques is available. This review compares established and new sample preparation and analytical methods to measure bone concentrations. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference abstracts and references from published articles on bone penetration of antibacterials. This article focuses on the standardization of drug analysis in bone, the extent and rate of bone penetration of antibacterials, and the design, evaluation and reporting techniques of pharmacokinetic studies of bone penetration. The focus is on studies conducted between 1998 and 2007, since a previous review was published in 1999. WinNonlin Professional version 5.0.1 software was used for statistics. Very different methods for sample preparation, drug analysis, data handling and reporting have been employed in bone penetration studies. There is substantial variability in the reported mean bone penetration between drugs and between different studies of the same drug. Quinolones, macrolides and linezolid have mean bone : serum concentration ratios that are commonly between 0.3 and 1.2, and higher ratios have been found for azithromycin (bone concentration in mg/kg of total bone). The ratios are usually between 0.15 and 0.3 for cephalosporins and glycopeptides, and between 0.1 and 0.3 for penicillins. Cephalosporins and penicillins have shown significantly lower (p < 0.05) concentration ratios than linezolid. For 20 of 25 different drugs, the ratios were higher for cancellous bone than for cortical bone. The available data show a larger extent of bone penetration for quinolones, macrolides and linezolid than for beta-lactams. The bone penetration of penicillins and cephalosporins was significantly lower than that of linezolid. Guidelines on sample preparation, drug analysis, study design and pharmacokinetic evaluation of bone penetration studies are vitally needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.