ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2009
Definitive chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with esophageal cancer: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Three-arm Phase III Trial Comparing Radiotherapy With Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Esophageal Cancer
Two Cycles Versus Four Cycles of Capecitabine Combined Oxaliplatin Concurrent Radiotherapy as First-line Therapy for Chinese Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas, an Open Randomised Phase III Cilinical Trial
A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of the Chemoradiation Versus Standard Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer in Chinese Patients
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiation therapy with phenotypic medicine: towards N-of-1 personalization.British journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Radiotherapy Alone or Concurrent Chemoradiation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Elderly Patients.Journal of Cancer · 2017Article
- The SCOPE of definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer: what direction for the future?Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Definitive chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin for elder patients with locally advanced squamous cell esophageal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2014Article
- Patterns of lymph node recurrence after radical surgery impacting on survival of patients with pT1-3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Eighteen patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled on the study. The chemotherapy during CRT consisted of two cycles of intravenous cisplatin of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oral capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily from day 1 to 14 at 3-week intervals. The radiotherapy (2.0 Gy fraction/day to a total dose of 60 Gy) was delivered to the primary tumor site and regional lymph node. After concurrent CRT, 2 cycles of capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d from days 1 to 14) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on day 1) were added every 3 weeks. All patients completed the planned treatment. After the chemoradiotherapy, 12 complete responses (CR, 66.7%) and 6 partial responses (PR, 33.3%) were confirmed. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia only occurred in 2 patients, plus no treatment-related death was observed. At a median follow-up duration of 14.9 months, the estimated overall survival and progression-free survival rate at 2-yr was 70.7% and 54.4%, respectively. Concurrent CRT with capecitabine and cisplatin was found to be well-tolerated and effective in patients with esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.