Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19270717›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2009

Fork regression is an active helicase-driven pathway in bacteriophage T4.

David T Long, Kenneth N Kreuzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A structure-specific nucleic acid-binding domain conserved among DNA repair proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rho-dependent transcription termination is essential to prevent excessive genome-wide R-loops in Escherichia coli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David T LongDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3711, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Kenneth N Kreuzer
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Recombination and fork progression in bacteriophage T4R01GM066934 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KREUZER, KENNETH N, WHITE, STEPHEN W · 2004 to 2013
$2.8M
INITIATION OF DNA REPLICATION IN THE PHAGE T4 SYSTEMR37GM034622 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KREUZER, KENNETH N · 2001 to 2005
$1.5M
INITIATION OF DNA REPLICATION IN THE PHAGE T4 SYSTEMR01GM034622 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KREUZER, KENNETH N · 1985 to 2000
$252k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066934NIGMS NIH HHS GM34622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066934NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM034622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactivation of stalled replication forks requires specialized mechanisms that can recognize the fork structure and promote downstream processing events. Fork regression has been implicated in several models of fork reactivation as a crucial processing step that supports repair. However, it has also been suggested that regressed forks represent pathological structures rather than physiological intermediates of repair. To investigate the biological role of fork regression in bacteriophage T4, we tested several mechanistic models of regression: strand exchange-mediated extrusion, topology-driven fork reversal and helicase-mediated extrusion. Here, we report that UvsW, a T4 branch-specific helicase, is necessary for the accumulation of regressed forks in vivo, and that UvsW-catalysed regression is the dominant mechanism of origin-fork processing that contributes to double-strand end formation. We also show that UvsW resolves purified fork intermediates in vitro by fork regression. Regression is therefore part of an active, UvsW-driven pathway of fork processing in bacteriophage T4.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage T4DNA HelicasesDNA ReplicationViral ProteinsDNA HelicasesUvsW protein, Bacteriophage T4Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19270717
PMCPMC2672904
OpenAlexW2008682870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.