Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19270493›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration

Cell lineages and early patterns of embryonic CNS vascularization.

Haymo Kurz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of theDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Ion Channel and GPCR Toolkit of Brain Capillary Pericytes.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Visualization of vascular mural cells in developing brain using genetically labeled transgenic reporter mice.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Engineering the human blood-brain barrier in vitro.Journal of biological engineering · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haymo KurzParacelsus Private Medical University Salzburg, Austria. haymo.kurz@pmu.ac.at
Paracelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First steps of blood vessel formation and patterning in the central nervous system (CNS) of higher vertebrates are presented. Corresponding to the regional diversity of the embryonic CNS (unsegmented spinal cord vs segmented brain anlagen) and its surroundings (segmented trunk vs unsegmented head mesoderm, neural crest-derived mesenchyme), cells of different origins contribute to the endothelial and mural cell populations. The autonomous migratory potential of endothelial cells is guided by attractive and repulsive clues. Nevertheless, a common pattern in both spinal cord and forebrain vascularization appears, with primary ventral vascular sprouts supplying the periventricular vascular plexus of the neural tube, whereas dorsolateral sprouts appear later.

Indexed as

Cell LineageNeovascularization, PathologicAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemHumans

Identifiers

PMID19270493
PMCPMC2679888
OpenAlexW2003986538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.