ArticleLancet (London, England)2009
Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00003422 (A Randomised Trial Comparing Pre-Operative Radiotherapy and Selective Post-Operative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 395 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Trial Comparing Pre-Operative Radiotherapy and Selective Post-Operative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
Who cites it
395 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis of the ALaCaRT and Z6051 randomized trials.BJS open · 2026Pooled it
- Resection quality and oncologic outcomes after robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Association Between Mesorectal Grade and Oncologic Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Radicality and safety of total mesopancreatic excision in pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Pooled it
- Long-term oncologic outcomes of transanal TME compared with transabdominal TME for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Right-side colectomy with complete mesocolic excision vs conventional right-side colectomy in the treatment of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of pathologic outcomes of robotic and open resections for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Objective assessment of surgical operative performance by observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA): a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Two-Year Outcomes after Direct-to-Surgery in Good Prognosis Margin-Clear Stage II or III Rectal Cancer: The QuickSilver Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- ArtiSential® vs. straight-stick in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: a prospective randomized study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Multicenter phase II trial of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: preliminary results.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
335 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLocal recurrence rates in operable rectal cancer are improved by radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) and surgical techniques such as total mesorectal excision. However, the contributions of surgery and radiotherapy to outcomes are unclear. We assessed the effect of the involvement of the circumferential resection margin and the plane of surgery achieved.
methodsIn this prospective study, the plane of surgery achieved and the involvement of the circumferential resection margin were assessed by local pathologists, using a standard pathological protocol in 1156 patients with operable rectal cancer from the CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 trial, which compared short-course (5 days) preoperative radiotherapy and selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy, between March, 1998, and August, 2005. All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 28785842.
findings128 patients (11%) had involvement of the circumferential resection margin, and the plane of surgery achieved was classified as good (mesorectal) in 604 (52%), intermediate (intramesorectal) in 398 (34%), and poor (muscularis propria plane) in 154 (13%). We found that both a negative circumferential resection margin and a superior plane of surgery achieved were associated with low local recurrence rates. Hazard ratio (HR) was 0.32 (95% CI 0.16-0.63, p=0.0011) with 3-year local recurrence rates of 6% (5-8%) and 17% (10-26%) for patients who were negative and positive for circumferential resection margin, respectively. For plane of surgery achieved, HRs for mesorectal and intramesorectal groups compared with the muscularis propria group were 0.32 (0.16-0.64) and 0.48 (0.25-0.93), respectively. At 3 years, the estimated local recurrence rates were 4% (3-6%) for mesorectal, 7% (5-11%) for intramesorectal, and 13% (8-21%) for muscularis propria groups. The benefit of short-course preoperative radiotherapy did not differ in the three plane of surgery groups (p=0.30 for trend). Patients in the short-course preoperative radiotherapy group who had a resection in the mesorectal plane had a 3-year local recurrence rate of only 1%.
interpretationIn rectal cancer, the plane of surgery achieved is an important prognostic factor for local recurrence. Short-course preoperative radiotherapy reduced the rate of local recurrence for all three plane of surgery groups, almost abolishing local recurrence in short-course preoperative radiotherapy patients who had a resection in the mesorectal plane. The plane of surgery achieved should therefore be assessed and reported routinely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.