Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19269307›Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2009

Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia.

Jared W Young, Susan B Powell, Victoria Risbrough, Hugh M Marston, Mark A Geyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 297 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jared W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0804, La Jolla, CA 92093-0804, USA.
Susan B Powell
Victoria Risbrough
Hugh M Marston
Mark A Geyer
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Inhibitory Deficits in Mania and Hyperdopaminiergic MiceR01MH071916 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GEYER, MARK A, PERRY, WILLIAM · 2004 to 2014
$4.2M
DEVELOPMENTAL MODELS OF GATING DEFICITS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH052885 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GEYER, MARK A · 1995 to 2010
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052885NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071916NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH52885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are among the core symptoms of the disease, correlate with functional outcome, and are not well treated with current antipsychotic therapies. In order to bring together academic, industrial, and governmental bodies to address this great 'unmet therapeutic need', the NIMH sponsored the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative. Through careful factor analysis and consensus of expert opinion, MATRICS identified seven domains of cognition that are deficient in schizophrenia (attention/vigilance, working memory, reasoning and problem solving, processing speed, visual learning and memory, verbal learning and memory, and social cognition) and recommended a specific neuropsychological test battery to probe these domains. In order to move the field forward and outline an approach for translational research, there is a need for a "preclinical MATRICS" to develop a rodent test battery that is appropriate for drug development. In this review, we outline such an approach and review current rodent tasks that target these seven domains of cognition. The rodent tasks are discussed in terms of their validity for probing each cognitive domain as well as a brief overview of the pharmacology and manipulations relevant to schizophrenia for each task.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionCognitionCognition DisordersHumansMemoryMiceNational Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)Neuropsychological TestsProblem SolvingRatsSchizophreniaUnited StatesVerbal Learning

Identifiers

PMID19269307
PMCPMC2688712
OpenAlexW2020326582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.