Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2009

Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus when combined with portion control diet modifies the metabolic syndrome.

A K Gupta, S R Smith, F L Greenway, G A Bray

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Body weight & compositioncomparator not stated · t2d, obesityfeeds 2 cells of the map
weight loss 1.25p < 0.05
Patients treated with Pio + ADA gained 2.15 +/- 1.09 kg (mean +/- SD) compared with a weight loss of 2.59 +/- 1.25 kg (p < 0.05) in the Pio + PC group, and a weight loss of 3.21 +/- 0.7 kg (p < 0.05) in the Met + ADA group.
Body weight & compositioncomparator not stated · t2d, obesityfeeds 2 cells of the map
weight loss 0.70p < 0.05
Patients treated with Pio + ADA gained 2.15 +/- 1.09 kg (mean +/- SD) compared with a weight loss of 2.59 +/- 1.25 kg (p < 0.05) in the Pio + PC group, and a weight loss of 3.21 +/- 0.7 kg (p < 0.05) in the Met + ADA group.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×body weight & composition

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

19 readable studies in this cell: 8 favour the treatment, 6 find no difference, 5 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 8 families support, 4 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.90-1.60 to -0.20
NCT008598981,093 enrolled · 2009
Δ -1.37-2.03 to -0.71
NCT00643851994 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.05-0.72 to 0.61
NCT02932475831 enrolled · 2017
Δ 0.04
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.04-0.61 to 0.53
NCT02980276535 enrolled · 2017
Δ -0.70-1.30 to -0.20
Δ 17.05.00 to 29.0
increase 1.26-0.24 to 2.75
weight loss -16.2-60.2 to -4.40

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Thiazolidinediones×body weight & composition

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ -3.56-4.21 to -2.90

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010 · on this map
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in nutrition · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients inadequately controlled on insulin.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A K GuptaPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA. alok.gupta@pbrc.edu
S R Smith
F L Greenway
G A Bray
Louisiana State University System · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundTreatment with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) produces weight gain.

objectiveTo test whether a portion control diet could prevent weight gain during treatment with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

designThis 16-week randomized, open-label, parallel arm study compared three groups: (i) pioglitazone plus the American Diabetes Association diet (Pio + ADA); (ii) pioglitazone plus a portion control weight loss diet (Pio + PC); (iii) metformin plus the American Diabetes Association diet (Met + ADA). All participants received the same advice about calorie reduction, lifestyle change and exercise.

methodsFifty-one men and women with T2DM, naive to TZDs, were randomized to a 16-week study. Pioglitazone (Pio) was titrated to a dose of 45 mg/day and metformin (Met) to a dose of 2 g/day. Fasting blood was collected for lipids, insulin and glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline and 16 weeks.

resultsForty-eight of fifty-one randomized subjects completed the study. Patients treated with Pio + ADA gained 2.15 +/- 1.09 kg (mean +/- SD) compared with a weight loss of 2.59 +/- 1.25 kg (p < 0.05) in the Pio + PC group, and a weight loss of 3.21 +/- 0.7 kg (p < 0.05) in the Met + ADA group. Waist circumference and visceral adipose tissue decreased significantly more in the Pio + PC group than in the Pio + ADA group. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly increased in the Pio + PC group compared with the Met + ADA group. Pioglitazone reduced insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) more than metformin. No significant differences between groups were seen for glucose, insulin, HbA1c or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

conclusionsPio + PC, prevented weight gain, reduced waist circumference and visceral fat compared with Pio + ADA diet.

Indexed as

Diet, ReducingAdultAgedAnthropometryCombined Modality TherapyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetabolic SyndromeMetforminMiddle AgedPioglitazoneThiazolidinedionesWaist CircumferenceHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPioglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID19267711
PMCPMC2748337
OpenAlexW1999964621

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.