Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19265745›Full record

Trial reportSexually transmitted diseases2009

Predictors of adherent use of diaphragms and microbicide gel in a four-arm, randomized pilot study among female sex workers in Madagascar.

Abigail Norris Turner, Kathleen Van Damme, Denise J Jamieson, Maria R Khan, Audrey E Pettifor, Theresa A Swezey, April J Bell, Daniel R Newman, Ana Penman-Aguilar, Mbolatiana S M Raharinivo and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail Norris TurnerDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7435, USA. ant@unc.edu
Kathleen Van Damme
Denise J Jamieson
Maria R Khan
Audrey E Pettifor
Theresa A Swezey
April J Bell
Daniel R Newman
Ana Penman-Aguilar
Mbolatiana S M Raharinivo
Bodo Randrianasolo
Felasoa Noroseheno Ramiandrisoa
Frieda M Behets
Mad STI Prevention Group
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCatholic University of Madagascar · MGCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCI TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007233 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS · PI GOLDSAMT, LLOYD A · 1985 to 2023
$20.2M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipants' protocol adherence may influence assessments of the effectiveness of new female-controlled methods for sexually transmitted infection prevention.

methodsIn 2005 we conducted a randomized pilot study among female sex workers (FSWs) in Madagascar in preparation for sexually transmitted infection prevention trial of diaphragms and a vaginal microbicide. Participants (n = 192) were randomized into 4 arms: diaphragm plus microbicide (Acidform), diaphragm plus placebo gel hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), Acidform alone, or HEC alone. FSWs were seen weekly for 4 weeks. Using multivariable regression with generalized estimating equations, we assessed predictors of adherent product use during all sex acts in the last week. We collapsed the gel-diaphragm arms together and the gel-only arms together for this analysis.

resultsBetween 43% and 67% of gel-diaphragm users (varying by visit) reported using study products during all sex acts in the last week, compared with 20% to 45% of gel-only users. Adherence increased with follow-up [visit 4 vs. visit 1 risk ratio (RR) for gel-diaphragm users: 1.55, P <0.01; for gel-only users, RR: 1.58, P = 0.01]. Gel-diaphragm users whose casual partners were never aware of products (RR: 2.02, P = 0.03) and who had experienced partner violence after requesting condom use (RR: 1.45, P <0.01) were more adherent. Gel-only users reporting lower sexual frequency (1-9 weekly acts vs. >or=19 acts, RR: 1.98, P <0.01) and no sex with primary partners in the past week (RR: 1.54, P = 0.02) were more adherent.

conclusionsGel-diaphragm users had better adherence than gel-only users, and predictors of adherence differed between groups. Addressing modifiable factors during counseling sessions may improve adherence.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceSex WorkAdolescentAdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCondomsContraceptive Devices, FemaleFemaleHumansMadagascarMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsSexually Transmitted DiseasesVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesYoung AdultAnti-Infective Agents, LocalVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID19265745
PMCPMC5824631
OpenAlexW2038409736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.