Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19265547›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2009

A qualitative examination of inappropriate hospital admissions and lengths of stay.

Christina L Hammond, Lorraine L Pinnington, Margaret F Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Short Stay Unit as a new option for hospitals: a review of the scientific literature.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Determinants of Inappropriate Admissions in County Hospitals in Rural China: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hospital admissions from nursing homes: a qualitative study of GP decision making.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina L HammondRehabilitation Research and Education Group, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK. mcxclh@nottingham.ac.uk
Lorraine L Pinnington
Margaret F Phillips

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has shown that a number of patients, with a variety of diagnoses, are admitted to hospital when it is not essential and can remain in hospital unnecessarily. To date, research in this area has been primarily quantitative. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceived causes of inappropriate or prolonged lengths of stay and focuses on a specific population (i.e., patients with long term neurological conditions). We also wanted to identify interventions which might avoid admission or expedite discharge as periods of hospitalisation pose particular risks for this group.

methodsTwo focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of eight primary and secondary care clinicians working in the Derbyshire area. Data were analysed using a thematic content approach.

resultsThe participants identified a number of key causes of inappropriate admissions and lengths of stay, including: the limited capacity of health and social care resources; poor communication between primary and secondary care clinicians and the cautiousness of clinicians who manage patients in community settings. The participants also suggested a number of strategies that may prevent inappropriate admissions or reduce length of stay (LoS), including: the introduction of new sub-acute care facilities; the introduction of auxiliary nurses to support specialist nursing staff and patient held summaries of specialist consultations.

conclusionClinicians in both the secondary and primary care sectors acknowledged that some admissions were unnecessary and some patients remain in hospital for a prolonged period. These events were attributed to problems with the current capacity or structuring of services. It was noted, for example, that there is a shortage of appropriate therapeutic services and that the distribution of beds between community and sub-acute care should be reviewed.

Indexed as

Length of StayEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMalePatient AdmissionReferral and ConsultationState MedicineSubacute Care

Identifiers

PMID19265547
PMCPMC2655293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.