Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19264846›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2009

Non-response to baseline, non-response to follow-up and mortality in the Whitehall II cohort.

Jane E Ferrie, Mika Kivimäki, Archana Singh-Manoux, Alison Shortt, Pekka Martikainen, Jenny Head, Michael Marmot, David Gimeno, Roberto De Vogli, Marko Elovainio and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changes Over Time in Absolute and Relative Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking: A Comparison of Cohort Studies From Britain, Finland, and Japan.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Socioeconomic and psychosocial adversity in midlife and depressive symptoms post retirement: a 21-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in a prospective cohort study of bicycle crash injuries.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jane E FerrieDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. j.ferrie@public-health.ucl.ac.uk
Mika Kivimäki
Archana Singh-Manoux
Alison Shortt
Pekka Martikainen
Jenny Head
Michael Marmot
David Gimeno
Roberto De Vogli
Marko Elovainio
Martin J Shipley

Funding

Socioeconomic gradient in CHD in early old ageR01HL036310 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI KIVIMAKI, MIKA J, MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1986 to 2012
$3.1M
SOCIAL FACTORS INFLUENCING MEDICAL OUTCOME MEASURESR01HS006516 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1990 to 1995
–
AHRQ HHS HS06516British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774NHLBI NIH HHS HL36310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the associations between non-response to follow-up surveys and mortality, or differences in these associations by socioeconomic position in studies with repeat data collections.

methodsThe Whitehall II study of socioeconomic inequalities in health provided response status from five data collection surveys; Phase 1 (1985-88, n = 10 308), Phase 5 (1997-99, n = 6533), and all-cause mortality to 2006. Odd-numbered phases included a medical examination in addition to a questionnaire.

resultsNon-response to baseline and to follow-up phases that included a medical examination was associated with a doubling of the mortality hazard in analyses adjusted for age and sex. Compared with complete responders, responders who missed one or more phases, but completed the last possible phase before they died, had a 38% excess risk of mortality. However, those who missed one or more phases including the last possible phase before death had an excess risk of 127%. There was no evidence that these associations differed by socioeconomic position.

conclusionIn studies with repeat data collections, non-response to follow-up is associated with the same doubling of the mortality risk as non-response to baseline; an association that is not modified by socioeconomic position.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathHealth SurveysSocioeconomic FactorsAdultAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19264846
PMCPMC2722814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.