Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19263014›Full record

Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009

Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection based on moxifloxacin triple therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Josip Bago, Branko Pevec, Monika Tomić, Marinko Marusić, Vinko Bakula, Petra Bago

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. The efficacy of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy in treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Update on quinolone-containing rescue therapies forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Review
  10. Should quinolones come first in Helicobacter pylori therapy?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Josip BagoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine Clinic, General Hospital "Sveti Duh", Zagreb, Croatia. josip.bago@zg.t-com.hr
Branko Pevec
Monika Tomić
Marinko Marusić
Vinko Bakula
Petra Bago

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, standard quadruple second-line therapy consisting of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline often fails and shows poor patient compliance. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as an alternative second-line protocol.

methodsA total of 160 patients, in whom the initial standard PPI triple therapy had failed to eradicate H. pylori infection, were included in the study. The initial H. pylori status was assessed using the (13)C-urea breath test. Patients were randomized to one of the following 7-day treatment regimens: (1) OMM: omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, moxifloxacin 400 mg/day, metronidazole 500 mg three times a day; and (2) OBMT: omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg four times a day, metronidazole 500 mg three times a day, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day. Patient compliance and adverse events were evaluated one week after completion of therapy. H. pylori status was re-assessed with the (13)C-urea breath test six weeks after the end of therapy.

resultsThe eradication rates were 73.2% (60/82) and 78.9% (60/76) with moxifloxacin-based triple therapy, and 53.8% (42/78) and 64.6% (42/65) with bismuth-based quadruple therapy, by intention-to-treat (p = 0.018) and per-protocol (p = 0.088) analyses, respectively. Adverse events/intolerability were described in 12/82 patients in the OMM group and 18/78 patients in the OBMT group. Compliance with treatment was 92.7% in the OMM group and 83.3% in the OBMT group.

conclusionMoxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a highly effective second-line eradication treatment in H. pylori infection. Because of its high levels of safety and tolerability, this protocol represents an adequate alternative to the standard bismuth-based quadruple therapy.

Indexed as

Proton Pump InhibitorsAdultAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsAza CompoundsBreath TestsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFluoroquinolonesGastritisHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMaleMetronidazoleAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsAza Compoundsbismuth tripotassium dicitrateFluoroquinolonesMetronidazoleMoxifloxacinOmeprazoleOrganometallic CompoundsProton Pump InhibitorsQuinolinesTetracycline

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.