Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19262098›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration

Modeling cell migration in 3D: Status and challenges.

Rajagopal Rangarajan, Muhammad H Zaman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantification of cell migration: metrics selection to model application.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integration ofFrontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational model of mesenchymal migration in 3D under chemotaxis.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Probabilistic Voxel-Fe model for single cell motility in 3D.In silico cell and tissue science · 2014
    Article
  14. Modeling persistence in mesenchymal cell motility using explicit fibers.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2014
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajagopal RangarajanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Muhammad H Zaman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is a multi-scale process that integrates signaling, mechanics and biochemical reaction kinetics. Various mathematical models accurately predict cell migration on 2D surfaces, but are unable to capture the complexities of 3D migration. Additionally, quantitative 3D cell migration models have been few and far between. In this review we look and characterize various mathematical models available in literature to predict cell migration in 3D matrices and analyze their strengths and possible changes to these models that could improve their predictive capabilities.

Indexed as

Cell MovementImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, BiologicalHumansMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID19262098
PMCPMC2634993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.