Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19261414›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of radiology2009

Advances in beta-cell imaging.

Anna Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of radiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. PET/MRI enables simultaneousTheranostics · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Targets and probes for non-invasive imaging of β-cells.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Imaging of beta-cell mass and function.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna MooreMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. amoore@helix.mgh.harvard.edu

Funding

In-Vivo Imaging of Islet TransplantationR01DK072137 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
In vivo imaging of diabetogenic cytotoxic T-lymphocytesR01DK064850 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2003 to 2006
$1.1M
Labeling Human Pancreatic Islets for Multi-Modal ImagingR21DK071225 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2005 to 2006
$765k
MEASURING OF PANCREATIC BETA-CELL MASS BY IMAGINGR21DK058511 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2000 to 2001
$345k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK071225NIDDK NIH HHS DK072137NIDDK NIH HHS DK58511NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064850NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072137NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK058511NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK071225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus results in impaired insulin production by pancreatic beta-cells due to their death and/or dysfunction. There is a growing unmet need among diabetes researches and clinicians to assess the level of surviving beta-cells non-invasively. This review will focus on employment of state-of-the-art in vivo imaging methods to estimate and evaluate beta-cell mass in animal models of diabetes.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes MellitusDiagnostic ImagingHumansInsulin-Secreting CellsMolecular Probe TechniquesRadionuclide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID19261414
PMCPMC2680935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.