Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19261255›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2009

Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response.

Monica M Reinholz, Amy K Bruzek, Daniel W Visscher, Wilma L Lingle, Matthew J Schroeder, Edith A Perez, Robert B Jenkins

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Regulation of antiviral and antitumor immunity by theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica M ReinholzDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amy K Bruzek
Daniel W Visscher
Wilma L Lingle
Matthew J Schroeder
Edith A Perez
Robert B Jenkins
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Biospecimen ResourceU24CA114740 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 2005 to 2014
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA114740NCI NIH HHS CA25224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U24 CA114740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormalities of chromosome 17, recognised over two decades ago to be important in tumorigenesis, often occur in breast cancer. Changes of specific loci on chromosome 17 including ERBB2 amplification, P53 loss, BRCA1 loss, and TOP2A amplification or deletion are known to have important roles in breast-cancer pathophysiology. Numerical aberrations of chromosome 17 are linked to breast-cancer initiation and progression, and possibly to treatment response. However, the clinical importance of chromosome 17 anomalies, in particular the effect on ERBB2 protein expression, is unknown. Reports are conflicting regarding the association of copy gain of chromosome 17 (polysomy 17) with strong ERBB2 protein expression in the absence of true ERBB2 gene amplification. Copy-number anomalies in chromosome 17 seem to be common in tumours that show discrepant ERBB2 expression and in tumours with discordant ERBB2-protein and ERBB2 gene copy number measurements. The mechanisms of ERBB2 dosage changes-gene amplification versus chromosome gain and loss-probably differ in primary and metastatic disease; however, a correction for chromosome 17 copy-number is necessary to completely distinguish between these mechanisms. A better understanding of how polysomy 17 affects gene-copy number and protein expression will help to select patients who will respond to therapies targeting ERBB2 and other protein products of chromosome 17 loci.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17AneuploidyAntigens, NeoplasmBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIFemaleGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-2Genes, p53HumansPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPrognosisAntigens, NeoplasmDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsTOP2A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19261255
PMCPMC5549275
OpenAlexW2049095878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.