Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19261185›Full record

ReviewRetrovirology2009

When is it time for reverse transcription to start and go?

Marylène Mougel, Laurent Houzet, Jean-Luc Darlix

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Retrovirology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The macrophage: a therapeutic target in HIV-1 infection.Molecular and cellular therapies · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Uracil DNA glycosylase initiates degradation of HIV-1 cDNA containing misincorporated dUTP and prevents viral integration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marylène MougelLaboRetro, Unité de virologie humaine INSERM U758, IFR128, ENS, 46 allée d'Italie, Lyon, France. marylene.mougel@univ-montp1.fr
Laurent Houzet
Jean-Luc Darlix
Inserm · FRNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USVirologie et Pathologies Humaines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon cell infection by a retrovirus, the viral DNA polymerase, called reverse transcriptase (RT), copies the genomic RNA to generate the proviral DNA flanked by two long terminal repeats (LTR). A discovery twenty years ago demonstrated that the structural viral nucleocapsid protein (NC) encoded by Gag is an essential cofactor of reverse transcription, chaperoning RT during viral DNA synthesis. However, it is only recently that NC was found to exert a control on the timing of reverse transcription, in a spatio-temporal manner. This brief review summarizes findings on the timing of reverse transcription in wild type HIV-1 and in nucleopcapsid (NC) mutants where virions contain a large amount of newly made viral DNA. This brief review also proposes some explanations of how NC may control late reverse transcription during Gag assembly in virus producer cells.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralHIV-1HumansNucleocapsid ProteinsRetroviridaeReverse TranscriptionTime FactorsDNA, ViralNucleocapsid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19261185
PMCPMC2656454
OpenAlexW2066257216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.