GuidelinePLoS medicine2009
Systematic reviews of genetic association studies. Human Genome Epidemiology Network.
Guideline in PLoS medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 60 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed, 60 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Genetic association studies in critically ill patients: a systematic review.EBioMedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Genetic architecture of primary biliary cholangitis: strong evidence for HLA and non-HLA risk loci.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- ABO blood groups and cardiovascular disease and its risk in continental Africans and people of African ancestry: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacogenetics of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2022Pooled it
- Polymorphisms in ERCC4 and ERCC5 and risk of cancers: Systematic research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Cumulative evidence for associations between genetic variants in interleukin 17 family gene and risk of human diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Epidemiological evidence for associations between variants in CHRNA genes and risk of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Cumulative Evidence for Relationships Between Multiple Variants in the TERT and CLPTM1L Region and Risk of Cancer and Non-Cancer Disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Genetic polymorphisms associated with susceptibility to COVID-19 disease and severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Genetic Variants Associated With Resilience in Human and Animal Studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Genetic association of ANRIL with susceptibility to Ischemic stroke: A comprehensive meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Cumulative Evidence for Associations Between Genetic Variants in Interleukin 6 Receptor Gene and Human Diseases and Phenotypes.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of host genetic factors associated with influenza severity.BMC genomics · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Genetic variants related to physical activity or sedentary behaviour: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Pooled it
- Host genetic susceptibility to mycetoma.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Epidemiological evidence for associations between variants in microRNA or biosynthesis genes and lung cancer risk.Cancer medicine · 2020Pooled it
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.