Axons get excited to death.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ischemia-Triggered Glutamate Excitotoxicity From the Perspective of Glial Cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
   Article
2. Roles of white matter in central nervous system pathophysiologies.ASN neuro · 2012
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Glutamate receptors on myelinated spinal cord axons: II. AMPA and GluR5 receptors.2009
• Comment on
  Glutamate receptors on myelinated spinal cord axons: I. GluR6 kainate receptors.2009

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as