ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2009
Molecular imaging of Bcr-Abl phosphokinase in a xenograft model.
Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase can be assessed by gamma-imaging using an 111In-labeled anti-phosphotyrosine (APT) antibody, and if the response to treatment with imatinib could be detected using this imaging technique. APT antibody was labeled with 111In using ethylenedicysteine (EC) as a chelator. To determine if 111In-EC-APT could assess a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, xenografts of the human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 were used. gamma-Scintigraphy of the tumor-bearing mice, before and after imatinib treatment, was obtained 1, 24, and 48 h after they were given 111In-EC-APT (100 microCi/mouse i.v.). 111In-EC-APT is preferentially taken up by Bcr-Abl-bearing tumor cells when compared with 111In-EC-BSA or 111In-EC-IgG1 controls and comparable with the level of uptake of 111In-EC-Bcr-Abl. Imatinib treatment resulted in decreased expression of phospho-Bcr-Abl by Western blot analysis, which correlated with early (4 days after starting imatinib) kinase down-regulation as assessed by imaging using 111In-EC-APT. The optimal time to imaging was 24 and 48 h after injection of 111In-EC-APT. Although tumor regression was insignificant on day 4 after starting imatinib treatment, it was marked by day 14. 111In-EC-APT can assess intracellular phosphokinase activity, and down-regulation of phosphokinase activity predates tumor regression. This technique may therefore be useful in the clinic to detect the presence of phosphokinase activity and for early prediction of response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.