Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19258276›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of human mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas to a new investigational ketolide, CEM-101.

Ken B Waites, D M Crabb, Lynn B Duffy

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Distribution Characteristics ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Article
  9. World journal of clinical cases · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Construction of a Nomogram for Identifying RefractoryJournal of inflammation research · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Journal of clinical medicine research · 2018
    Review
  19. New Horizons in Mycoplasma genitalium Treatment.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken B WaitesDepartment of Pathology, 619 19th Street South, WP 230, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA. waiteskb@uab.edu
D M Crabb
Lynn B Duffy
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MICs were determined for an investigational ketolide, CEM-101, and azithromycin, telithromycin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, clindamycin, and linezolid against 36 Mycoplasma pneumoniae, 5 Mycoplasma genitalium, 13 Mycoplasma hominis, 15 Mycoplasma fermentans, and 20 Ureaplasma isolates. All isolates, including two macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae isolates, were inhibited by CEM-101 at < or = 0.5 microg/ml, making CEM-101 the most potent compound tested.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansKetolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycoplasmaMycoplasma fermentansMycoplasma genitaliumMycoplasma InfectionsMycoplasma pneumoniaeUreaplasmaUreaplasma InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsKetolides

Identifiers

PMID19258276
PMCPMC2681567
OpenAlexW2164073249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.