ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009
Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir predict suboptimal therapeutic concentrations in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-infected children.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimizing Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents
A Pharmacokinetics Study Comparing Lopinavir Plasma Exposure When Given as Lopinavir/Ritonavir (1:1) in the Presence of Rifampicin and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (4:1) Without Rifampicin in HIV and TB Co-infected Children in South Africa.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir crushed versus whole tablets in children.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2011Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy after switch to once-daily lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected children.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Trial
- Is Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-Retroviral Agents Warranted in Children Living with HIV?The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022Article
- Optimizing Pediatric Dosing Recommendations and Treatment Management of Antiretroviral Drugs Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Children Living With HIV.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2019Review
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir/Ritonavir: Changes Across Formulations and Human Development From Infancy Through Adulthood.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir determined with an ELISA test in youths with perinatally acquired HIV.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2014Article
- Assessment of lopinavir pharmacokinetics with respect to developmental changes in infants and the impact on weight band-based dosing.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2012Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in combination with rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment in HIV-infected children.Antiviral therapy · 2012Article
- It is time to consider third-line options in antiretroviral-experienced paediatric patients?Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2011Article
- CYP3A5, ABCB1, and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and pharmacokinetics and virologic outcome of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2011Article
- Antiretroviral drugs in pediatric HIV-infected patients: pharmacokinetic and practical challenges.Paediatric drugs · 2011Review
- Pharmacokinetic optimization of antiretroviral therapy in children and adolescents.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011Review
- Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in combination with rifampicin-based antitubercular treatment in HIV-infected South African children.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010Article
- Can therapeutic drug monitoring improve pharmacotherapy of HIV infection in adolescents?Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2010Article
- Comment on: Pharmacokinetics and 48 week efficacy of low-dose lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected children.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In adult protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients, a lopinavir (LPV) phenotypic inhibitory quotient (PIQ) of >15 has been associated with a higher likelihood of viral suppression. The aims of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of LPV in children and to estimate the probability of achieving a PIQ of >15. HIV-infected, PI-experienced children receiving LPV were intensively sampled for 12 h to measure plasma LPV. The data were fitted to candidate PK models (using MM-USCPACK software), and the final model was used to simulate 1,000 children to determine the probability of achieving an LPV PIQ of >15. In 50 patients (4 to 18 years old), the median LPV plasma 12-hour-postdose concentration was 5.9 mg/liter (range, 0.03 to 16.2 mg/liter) lower than that reported in adults. After a delay, LPV was absorbed linearly into a central compartment whose size was dependent on the weight and age of the patient. Elimination was dependent on weight. The regression line of observed versus predicted LPV had an R(2) of 0.99 and a slope of 1.0. Visual predictive checks against all available measured concentrations showed good predictive ability of the model. The probability of achieving an LPV PIQ of >15 was >90% for wild-type virus but <10% for even moderately resistant virus. The currently recommended dose of LPV/ritonavir appears to be adequate for children infected with wild-type virus but is unlikely to provide adequate inhibitory concentrations for even moderately resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). PI-experienced HIV-infected children will likely benefit from longitudinal, repeated LPV measurement in plasma to ensure that drug exposure is most often near the maximal end of the observed safe range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.