Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19257881›Full record

GuidelineRespiratory research2009

EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.

Gianna Moscato, Olivier Vandenplas, Roy Gerth Van Wijk, Jean-Luc Malo, Luca Perfetti, Santiago Quirce, Jolanta Walusiak, Roberto Castano, Gianni Pala, Denyse Gautrin and 5 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Respiratory research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Allergic rhinitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Occupational rhinitis.Allergologie select · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nasoseptal Perforation: from Etiology to Treatment.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  18. Allergic rhinitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Usefulness of Biomarkers in Work-Related Airway Disease.Current treatment options in allergy · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gianna MoscatoAllergy and Immunology Unit, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Institute of Care and Research, Scientific Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. gmoscato@fsm.it
Olivier Vandenplas
Roy Gerth Van Wijk
Jean-Luc Malo
Luca Perfetti
Santiago Quirce
Jolanta Walusiak
Roberto Castano
Gianni Pala
Denyse Gautrin
Hans De Groot
Ilenia Folletti
Mona Rita Yacoub
Andrea Siracusa
European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunolgy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present document is the result of a consensus reached by a panel of experts from European and non-European countries on Occupational Rhinitis (OR), a disease of emerging relevance which has received little attention in comparison to occupational asthma. The document covers the main items of OR including epidemiology, diagnosis, management, socio-economic impact, preventive strategies and medicolegal issues. An operational definition and classification of OR tailored on that of occupational asthma, as well as a diagnostic algorithm based on steps allowing for different levels of diagnostic evidence are proposed. The needs for future research are pointed out. Key messages are issued for each item.

Indexed as

Occupational DiseasesRhinitisAlgorithmsAsthmaBiomedical ResearchDisability EvaluationHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTerminology as TopicTreatment OutcomeWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID19257881
PMCPMC2654869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.