ReviewAdvances in dermatology2008
Application of angiogenesis to clinical dermatology.
Review in Advances in dermatology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin Transcriptome of Middle-Aged Women Supplemented With Natural Herbo-mineral Shilajit Shows Induction of Microvascular and Extracellular Matrix Mechanisms.Journal of the American College of Nutrition · 2019Trial
- Metformin: A Potential Treatment for Acne, Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Rosacea.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Review
- Operationalizing the Use of Biofabricated Tissue Models as Preclinical Screening Platforms for Drug Discovery and Development.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2021Article
- 3D cell culture using a clinostat reproduces microgravity-induced skin changes.NPJ microgravity · 2021Article
- Gentian violet: a 19th century drug re-emerges in the 21st century.Experimental dermatology · 2013Review
- Beneficial actions of the anti-inflammatory dimethyl fumarate in glioblastomas.Surgical neurology international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.