ArticleJournal of veterinary science2009
Prevalence of Bartonella henselae and Bartonella clarridgeiae in cats and dogs in Korea.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Global Molecular Prevalence ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Pooled it
- The prevalence and genetic diversity of Bartonella species in wild rodents from South Korea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Zoonotic Risk ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
- Performance and overview of clinically relevant areas of application of saliva testing in the cat.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- ProfilingJournal of veterinary science · 2023Article
- Occurrence and bacterial loads of Bartonella and haemotropic Mycoplasma species in privately owned cats and dogs and their fleas from East and Southeast Asia.Zoonoses and public health · 2022Article
- Serological and Molecular Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Zoonotic Bartonella species in Eurasian wolves and other free-ranging wild mammals from Italy.Zoonoses and public health · 2021Article
- Prevalence of hemoplasmas and Bartonella species in client-owned cats in Beijing and Shanghai, China.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2021Article
- Serological and Molecular Evidence ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite (SENLAT) caused by Bartonella henselae in Korea: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Detection of Bartonella spp. in dogs after infection with Rickettsia rickettsii.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2020Article
- Assessment of a metabarcoding approach for the characterisation of vector-borne bacteria in canines from Bangkok, Thailand.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Molecular Survey ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019Article
- Bartonella infections in cats and dogs including zoonotic aspects.Parasites & vectors · 2018Review
- Genetic diversity, infection prevalence, and possible transmission routes of Bartonella spp. in vampire bats.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Molecular Detection ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018Article
- Bartonella Species, an Emerging Cause of Blood-Culture-Negative Endocarditis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- The seroprevalence ofThe Korean journal of internal medicine · 2017Article
- [Molecular Epidemiology of Bartonella henselae in Stray and Sheltered Cats of Zaragoza, Spain].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood, saliva, and nail samples were collected from 54 dogs and 151 cats and analyzed for the presence of Bartonella henselae with a novel nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Bartonella (B.) henselae was detected in feral cat blood (41.8%), saliva (44.1%), and nail (42.7%) samples. B. henselae was also detected in pet cat blood (33.3%), saliva (43.5%), and nail (29.5%) samples and in pet dog blood (16.6%), saliva (18.5%), and nail (29.6%) samples. Nine samples were infected with B. clarridgeiae and 2 were co-infected with B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae of blood samples of dogs. This report is the first to investigate the prevalence of B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae in dogs and cats in Korea, and suggests that dogs and cats may serve as potential Bartonella reservoirs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.