Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19255523›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2009

A multiplex real-time PCR for differential detection and quantification of Salmonella spp., Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Enteritidis in meats.

Su Hwa Lee, Byeong Yeal Jung, Nabin Rayamahji, Hee Soo Lee, Woo Jin Jeon, Kang Seuk Choi, Chang Hee Kweon, Han Sang Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis cocultured with Acanthamoeba castellanii responds to nutrient availability.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The protective effect of dietary supplementation ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Rapid Detection and Differentiating of the PredominantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Combined effects of3 Biotech · 2020
    Article
  14. Resistance Profiles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence ofVeterinary world · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Su Hwa LeeNational Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service, Anyang 430-824, Korea.
Byeong Yeal Jung
Nabin Rayamahji
Hee Soo Lee
Woo Jin Jeon
Kang Seuk Choi
Chang Hee Kweon
Han Sang Yoo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella (S.) Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are the major causative agents of food-borne illnesses worldwide. Currently, a rapid detection system using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been applied for other food-borne pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. A multiplex real-time PCR was developed for the simultaneous detection of Salmonella spp., especially S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, in beef and pork. For the specific and sensitive multiplex real-time PCR, three representative primers and probes were designed based on sequence data from Genbank. Among the three DNA extraction methods (boiling, alkaline lysis, and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit), the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit was the most sensitive in this study. The optimized multiplex real-time PCR was applied to artificially inoculated beef or pork. The detection sensitivity of the multiplex real-time PCR was increased. The specificity of the multiplex real-time PCR assay, using 128 pure-cultured bacteria including 110 Salmonella isolates and 18 non-Salmonella isolates, was 100%, 100% and 99.1% for Salmonella spp., S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, respectively. The sensitivity was 100%, 100% and 91.7% for Salmonella spp., S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis, respectively. The multiplex real-time PCR assay developed in this study could detect up to 0.54 +/- 0.09 and 0.65 +/- 0.07 log(10) CFU/ml for S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis for beef, 1.45 +/- 0.21 and 1.65 +/- 0.07 log(10) CFU/ml for S. Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis for pork, respectively, with all conditions optimized. Our results indicated that the multiplex real-time PCR assay developed in this study could sensitively detect Salmonella spp. and specifically differentiate S. Typhimurium from S. Enteritidis in meats.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialMeatPolymerase Chain ReactionSalmonellaSensitivity and SpecificitySwineDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19255523
PMCPMC2801102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.