ArticleCBE life sciences education2009
High school intervention for influenza biology and epidemics/pandemics: impact on conceptual understanding among adolescents.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Zealand school children's perspectives on influenza: listening to young voices in respiratory health.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- What College Biology Students Know about How Vaccines Work.CBE life sciences education · 2022Article
- Teaching and learning about respiratory infectious diseases: A scoping review of interventions in K-12 education.Journal of research in science teaching · 2022Article
- Article
- Virus-related Knowledge in Covid-19 Times - Results from two Cross-sectional Studies in Austria and Implications for School.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Accuracy of COVID-19 relevant knowledge among youth: Number of information sources matters.PloS one · 2022Article
- Connecting the Dots from Professional Development to Student Learning.CBE life sciences education · 2021Article
- Assessing adolescents' critical health literacy: How is trust in government leadership associated with knowledge of COVID-19?PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- The effectiveness of disaster risk communication: a systematic review of intervention studies.PLoS currents · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding real-life issues such as influenza epidemiology may be of particular interest to the development of scientific knowledge and initiation of conceptual changes about viruses and their life cycles for high school students. The goal of this research project was to foster the development of adolescents' conceptual understanding of viruses and influenza biology. Thus, the project included two components: 1) pre- and posttests to determine students' conceptions about influenza biology, epidemics/pandemics, and vaccination; and 2) design an intervention that supports conceptual change to promote improvements in influenza knowledge based on these primary conceptions. Thirty-five female students from a high school biology class participated in a series of instructional activities and pre- and posttest assessments. Results from the pretest indicated that high school students exhibit a limited understanding of concepts related to viruses. Six weeks after an intervention that promoted active learning, results from a posttest showed that conceptions about influenza are more accurately related to the provided scientific knowledge. Although adolescents have nonscientific models to explain influenza biology, we showed that a carefully designed intervention can affect students' knowledge as well as influence the implementation of health education programs in secondary schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.