Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19254939›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2009

Confronting challenges in intervention research with ethnically diverse older adults: the USC Well Elderly II Trial.

Jeanne Jackson, Deborah Mandel, Jeanine Blanchard, Mike Carlson, Barbara Cherry, Stanley Azen, Chih-Ping Chou, Maryalice Jordan-Marsh, Todd Forman, Brett White and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Predictors of retention among African American and Hispanic older adult research participants in the Well Elderly 2 randomized controlled trial.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2014
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jeanne JacksonDivision of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-9003, USA. jmjackso@usc.edu.
Deborah Mandel
Jeanine Blanchard
Mike Carlson
Barbara Cherry
Stanley Azen
Chih-Ping Chou
Maryalice Jordan-Marsh
Todd Forman
Brett White
Douglas Granger
Bob Knight
Florence Clark

Funding

Health Mediating Effects of the Well Elderly ProgramR01AG021108 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CLARK, FLORENCE A. · 2004 to 2007
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-dwelling older adults are at risk for declines in physical health, cognition, and psychosocial well-being. However, their enactment of active and health-promoting lifestyles can reduce such declines. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to describe the USC Well Elderly II study, a randomized clinical trial designed to test the effectiveness of a healthy lifestyle program for elders, and document how various methodological challenges were addressed during the course of the trial.

methodsIn the study, 460 ethnically diverse elders recruited from a variety of sites in the urban Los Angeles area were enrolled in a randomized experiment involving a crossover design component. Within either the first or second 6-month phase of their study involvement, each elder received a lifestyle intervention designed to improve a variety of aging outcomes. At 4-5 time points over an 18-24 month interval, the research participants were assessed on measures of healthy activity, coping, social support, perceived control, stress-related biomarkers, perceived physical health, psychosocial well-being, and cognitive functioning to test the effectiveness of the intervention and document the process mechanisms responsible for its effects.

resultsThe study protocol was successfully implemented, including the enrollment of study sites, the recruitment of 460 older adults, administration of the intervention, adherence to the plan for assessment, and establishment of a large computerized data base. LIMITATIONS: Methodological challenges were encountered in the areas of site recruitment, participant recruitment, testing, and intervention delivery.

conclusionsThe completion of clinical trials involving elders from numerous local sites requires careful oversight and anticipation of threats to the study design that stem from: (a) social situations that are particular to specific study sites; and (b) physical, functional, and social challenges pertaining to the elder population.

Indexed as

Life StyleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedCaliforniaEthnicityHealth PromotionHealth StatusHumansPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID19254939
PMCPMC3073495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.