ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009
DIYA: a bacterial annotation pipeline for any genomics lab.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome structural variation inMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomics Reveals Factors Associated with Phenotypic Expression of Wolbachia.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Differences between predicted outer membrane proteins of genotype 1 and 2 Mannheimia haemolytica.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- Genome expansion of an obligate parthenogenesis-associated Wolbachia poses an exception to the symbiont reduction model.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Convergence of plasmid architectures drives emergence of multi-drug resistance in a clonally diverse Escherichia coli population from a veterinary clinical care setting.Veterinary microbiology · 2017Article
- Evolution of a zoonotic pathogen: investigating prophage diversity in enterohaemorrhagicMicrobial genomics · 2016Article
- A Primer on Infectious Disease Bacterial Genomics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016Review
- Large genomic differences between Moraxella bovoculi isolates acquired from the eyes of cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis versus the deep nasopharynx of asymptomatic cattle.Veterinary research · 2016Article
- Complete Closed Genome Sequences of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serotypes Anatum, Montevideo, Typhimurium, and Newport, Isolated from Beef, Cattle, and Humans.Genome announcements · 2016Article
- Comparative Methylome Analysis of the Occasional Ruminant Respiratory Pathogen Bibersteinia trehalosi.PloS one · 2016Article
- Quantitative frame analysis and the annotation of GC-rich (and other) prokaryotic genomes. An application to Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Functionally Structured Genomes in Lactobacillus kunkeei Colonizing the Honey Crop and Food Products of Honeybees and Stingless Bees.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Extensive intra-phylotype diversity in lactobacilli and bifidobacteria from the honeybee gut.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Genome sequencing and comparative genomics provides insights on the evolutionary dynamics and pathogenic potential of different H-serotypes of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104.BMC microbiology · 2015Article
- Complete genome sequence of the thermophilic Thermus sp. CCB_US3_UF1 from a hot spring in Malaysia.Standards in genomic sciences · 2015Article
- Integration of heterogeneous molecular networks to unravel gene-regulation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- High-Throughput Sequencing, a VersatileWeapon to Support Genome-Based Diagnosis in Infectious Diseases: Applications to Clinical Bacteriology.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Complete Closed Genome Sequences of Four Mannheimia varigena Isolates from Cattle with Shipping Fever.Genome announcements · 2014Article
- Complete Closed Genome Sequences of Three Bibersteinia trehalosi Nasopharyngeal Isolates from Cattle with Shipping Fever.Genome announcements · 2014Article
- Identifying pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenomics using computational approaches.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledDIYA (Do-It-Yourself Annotator) is a modular and configurable open source pipeline software, written in Perl, used for the rapid annotation of bacterial genome sequences. The software is currently used to take DNA contigs as input, either in the form of complete genomes or the result of shotgun sequencing, and produce an annotated sequence in Genbank file format as output. AVAILABILITY: Distribution and source code are available at (https://sourceforge.net/projects/diyg/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.