Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19254546›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Studying RecBCD helicase translocation along Chi-DNA using tethered particle motion with a stretching force.

Hsiu-Fang Fan, Hung-Wen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. On the mechanism of recombination hotspot scanning during double-stranded DNA break resection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hsiu-Fang FanDepartment of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Hung-Wen Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli RecBCD helicase unwinds blunt-end duplex DNA to repair damaged DNA molecules in the homologous recombination pathway. Previous single-molecule experiments showed that RecBCD recognizes an 8 nt DNA sequence, chi, and lowers its unwinding rate afterward under saturating ATP condition. We have developed a single-molecule force-tethered particle motion (FTPM) method, which is modified from the conventional TPM method, and applied it to study RecBCD motion in detail. In the FTPM experiment, a stretching force is applied to the DNA-bead complex that suppresses the bead's Brownian motion, resulting in an improved spatial resolution at long DNA substrates. Based on the equipartition theorem, the mean-square displacement of the bead's Brownian motion measured by FTPM correlates linearly to DNA extension length with a predicted slope, circumventing the difficulties of conventional TPM experiments, such as nonlinearity and low resolution of long DNA substrates. The FTPM method offers the best resolution in the presence of only a small stretching force (0.20 pN). We used the FTPM method to investigate RecBCD helicase motion along 4.1 kb long chi-containing duplex DNA molecules, and observed that the translocation rate of RecBCD changes after the chi sequence under limited ATP concentrations. This suggests that chi recognition by RecBCD does not require saturating ATP conditions, contrary to what was previously reported.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateBiophysicsDNA, BacterialDNA HelicasesEscherichia coliExodeoxyribonuclease VLinear ModelsStreptavidinAdenosine TriphosphateDNA, BacterialDNA HelicasesExodeoxyribonuclease VStreptavidin

Identifiers

PMID19254546
PMCPMC2717269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.