Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19253306›Full record

ReviewInflammatory bowel diseases2009

Inflammatory bowel disease: a paradigm for the link between coagulation and inflammation.

Hideo Yoshida, D Neil Granger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Angiogenesis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hideo YoshidaDepartment of Molecular & Cellular Physiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932, USA.
D Neil Granger
Keio University · JPLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · US

Funding

VASCULAR REACTIVITY FOLLOWING ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSIONP01DK043785 · NIDDK · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI GRANGER, D. NEIL · 1991 to 2011
$17.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK043785NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK43785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are associated with platelet activation and an increased risk for thromboembolism. While the mechanisms that underlie the altered platelet function and hypercoagulable state in IBD remain poorly understood, emerging evidence indicates that inflammation and coagulation are interdependent processes that can initiate a vicious cycle wherein each process propagates and intensifies the other. This review addresses the mechanisms that may account for the mutual activation of coagulation and inflammation during inflammation and summarizes evidence that implicates a role for platelets and the coagulation system in the pathogenesis of human and experimental IBD. The proposed link between inflammation and coagulation raises the possibility of targeting the inflammation-coagulation interface to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with IBD.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationBlood Coagulation DisordersHumansInflammationInflammatory Bowel Diseases

Identifiers

PMID19253306
PMCPMC2713811
OpenAlexW2033086674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.