Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19253021›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2009

A phase I/II trial of a polysaccharide extract from Grifola frondosa (Maitake mushroom) in breast cancer patients: immunological effects.

Gary Deng, Hong Lin, Andrew Seidman, Monica Fornier, Gabriella D'Andrea, Kathleen Wesa, Simon Yeung, Susanna Cunningham-Rundles, Andrew J Vickers, Barrie Cassileth

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Bioactivity research inFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Anti-Cancer Potential of Edible/Medicinal Mushrooms in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Integrating herbal medicine into oncology care delivery: development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. The Health and Clinical Benefits of Medicinal Fungi.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gary DengIntegrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. dengg@mskcc.org
Hong Lin
Andrew Seidman
Monica Fornier
Gabriella D'Andrea
Kathleen Wesa
Simon Yeung
Susanna Cunningham-Rundles
Andrew J Vickers
Barrie Cassileth

Funding

Regulation by the Immune Response to Vaccines by BotanicalsP50AT002779 · NCCIH · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI LEUNG, PING CHUNG · 2005 to 2009
$7.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS P50 AT002779NCCIH NIH HHS P50AT002779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients commonly use dietary supplements to "boost immune function". A polysaccharide extract from Grifola frondosa (Maitake extract) showed immunomodulatory effects in preclinical studies and therefore the potential for clinical use. Whether oral administration in human produces measurable immunologic effects, however, is unknown.

methodsIn a phase I/II dose escalation trial, 34 postmenopausal breast cancer patients, free of disease after initial treatment, were enrolled sequentially in five cohorts. Maitake liquid extract was taken orally at 0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 3, or 5 mg/kg twice daily for 3 weeks. Peripheral blood was collected at days -7, 0 (prior to the first dosing), 7, 14, and 21 for ex vivo analyses. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability.

resultsNo dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. Two patients withdrew prior to completion of the study due to grade I possibly related side effects: nausea and joint swelling in one patient; rash and pruritus in the second. There was a statistically significant association between Maitake and immunologic function (p < 0.0005). Increasing doses of Maitake increased some immunologic parameters and depressed others; the dose-response curves for many endpoints were non-monotonic with intermediate doses having either immune enhancing or immune suppressant effects compared with both high and low doses.

conclusionsOral administration of a polysaccharide extract from Maitake mushroom is associated with both immunologically stimulatory and inhibitory measurable effects in peripheral blood. Cancer patients should be made aware of the fact that botanical agents produce more complex effects than assumed, and may depress as well as enhance immune function.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCytokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGrifolaHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPolysaccharidesCytokinesPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID19253021
PMCPMC3751581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.