Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19252973›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2009

Radiation resistance of breast cancer stem cells: understanding the clinical framework.

Bisrat G Debeb, Wei Xu, Wendy A Woodward

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of Akt signaling in resistance to DNA-targeted therapy.World journal of clinical oncology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bisrat G DebebDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Wei Xu
Wendy A Woodward
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Human Breast Cancer Stem Cell SurrogatesR01CA138239 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CRISTOFANILLI, MASSIMO, REUBEN, JAMES MARTIN · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01CA138239-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-analyses of tens of thousands of women treated with radiation as a component of their breast cancer treatment have shown that radiation improves overall survival from breast cancer in women with early stage and advanced disease. However, data suggest that breast cancer stem/progenitor cells can be enriched after radiation and that breast cancer stem/progenitor clonogens are particularly resistant to radiation. Potentially resistant breast cancer stem/progenitor populations appear to be over-represented in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer and indeed, clinically these cancers are more resistant to radiation than estrogen receptor positive breast cancers. Emerging pre-clinical data suggest that targeting cancer stem/progenitor survival pathways may lead to effective radiosensitization in subgroups of patients with resistant disease. Herein, preclinical studies are reviewed in the context of the clinical framework.

Indexed as

Radiation ToleranceAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsHealthHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID19252973
OpenAlexW1982878657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.