ArticleSurgical endoscopy2009
Endoscopic augmentation of the esophagogastric junction with polymethylmethacrylate: durability, safety, and efficacy after 6 months in mini-pigs.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoluminal Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: In Between the Pill and the Knife?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsEndoscopic augmentation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been reported in an experimental short-term study. We assessed whether endoscopic augmentation of the EGJ with PMMA is durable, safe, and efficacious after 6 months in mini-pigs.
methodsTen mini-pigs were studied under anesthesia. After a pilot study in two animals, eight mini-pigs underwent lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry and gastrostomy with measurement of gastric yield volume (GYV) and gastric yield pressure (GYP). Endoscopic implantation of PMMA was performed aiming for the submucosa of the EGJ. Six months later, LES manometry and GYV and GYP measurements were repeated and animals were sacrificed, followed by microscopic analyses of the EGJ.
resultsOut of 32 implants (four per animal), 29 (91%) were identified as submucosal nodules postmortem. PMMA deposits were found at microscopic analysis in all animals and located as follows [mean (range)]: submucosa 61.5% (37.5-91%), muscularis propria 21.5% (0-58%), mucosa 11% (0-25%), and subserosa 6% (0-17%). Neither esophageal perforation nor death was observed. A significant increase in GYV (1,404 versus 905 ml; p = 0.02) and a borderline increase in GYP (8.1 versus 6.5 mmHg; p = 0.057) were detected 6 months later.
conclusionsEndoscopic augmentation of the esophagogastric junction with PMMA was durable and had no complications after 6 months. However, the occurrence of implants in the subserosa requires technical refinement before use in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.