Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19252776›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2009

Pregnancy and epilepsy: what should we tell our patients?

Torbjörn Tomson, Dina Battino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Epilepsy: recent advances.Journal of neurology · 2010
    Review
  3. Neonatal episodic hypoglycemia: a finding of valproic acid withdrawal.Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Torbjörn TomsonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. torbjorn.tomson@karolinska.se
Dina Battino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with epilepsy that plan to become pregnant can in general look forward to uneventful pregnancies and to giving birth to normal children. However, there are certain risks associated with epilepsy and antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment, and it is likely that these risks can be reduced with appropriate prepregnancy counseling. Women with epilepsy should be informed that maintained control of tonic-clonic seizures is important for their health as well as for the well-being of the fetus; that pregnancy in general has little effect on seizure control; but that pregnancy may affect plasma concentrations of AEDs, and that drug level monitoring and dosage adjustments may be needed. They should be informed of the moderately increased risk of birth defects, and that this risk appears to be higher with the use of valproate, in particular at doses above 800 mg/day. The possibility of changing from valproate to another AED should be considered, but such changes should be tried out before conception. Withdrawing or changing an AED should generally be avoided during pregnancy. Women with epilepsy on AED treatment should be encouraged to breast-feed.

Indexed as

EpilepsyPregnancy ComplicationsAbnormalities, Drug-InducedAnticonvulsantsBreast FeedingCognition DisordersContraindicationsDirective CounselingFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRiskSeizuresAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.