Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19252044›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2009

Depression screening of perinatal women: an evaluation of the healthy start depression initiative.

Kimberly A Yonkers, Megan V Smith, Haliqun Lin, Heather B Howell, Lin Shao, Robert A Rosenheck

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02935504 (PRogram In Support of Moms), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02935504 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

PRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM): A Pilot Group Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2014 to 2016Enrolled33ConditionsPerinatal DepressionArmsPRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM), MCPAP for Moms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preventing Perinatal Depression Now: A Call to Action.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly A YonkersDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. kimberly.yonkers@yale.edu
Megan V Smith
Haliqun Lin
Heather B Howell
Lin Shao
Robert A Rosenheck
Yale University · US

Funding

Effects of Perinatal Depression on PTD and LBWR01HD045735 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YONKERS, KIMBERLY A · 2004 to 2008
$4.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN MENTAL HEALTH EPIDEMIOLOGYT32MH014235 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, HEPING · 1985 to 2014
$4.0M
DETECTION AND TREATMENT OF POSTPARTUM DEPRESSIONK08MH001908 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YONKERS, KIMBERLY A · 1999 to 2003
$633k
NICHD NIH HHS 5-R0-HD045735NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045735NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH001908NIMH NIH HHS MH-01908-04NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH014235NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH014235PHS HHS 1H78MC00028-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo address problems with low rates of detection and treatment of depression of pregnant and postpartum women, many advocate depression screening in obstetrical settings. This study evaluated the Healthy Start depression initiative to assess whether it resulted in diminished rates of depressive symptoms and increased rates of detection, referral, and treatment among pregnant and postpartum women.

methodsThree cohorts were used to examine the program impact: a pre-Healthy Start depression initiative cohort, a post-Healthy Start depression initiative cohort that was enrolled in New Haven Healthy Start, and a post-Healthy Start depression initiative cohort not enrolled in the New Haven program. Participants included 1,336 pregnant and postpartum women receiving obstetrical care at publicly funded health care clinics. Measures included the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Brief Patient Health Questionnaire; the PTSD Symptom Scale; a five-item modification of the Conflict Tactics Scale; and questions regarding alcohol, illicit substances, and general medical and obstetrical history.

resultsThe Healthy Start depression initiative changed neither levels of depressive symptoms nor use of depression treatment in unselected populations. The initiative may have decreased the rate of referral for depression in the cohort under study.

conclusionsUniversal screening and support for treatment referral by paraprofessionals did not reduce the overall rates of depressive symptoms of perinatal women who received care at publicly funded obstetrical clinics. Future work on depression screening should consider strategies to engage women who are more severely affected by a depressive disorder in behavioral health treatment.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesConnecticutDepression, PostpartumDepressive DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMass ScreeningMental Health ServicesPregnancyProgram EvaluationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReferral and ConsultationSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19252044
PMCPMC3092533
OpenAlexW2114772523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.